Edgewater Project Raises Concerns

First hearing held on 307-unit development

By Jeff Simms

Nine people spoke out during a short but spirited public hearing on May 9 about a development of more than 300 apartments — it would be Beacon’s largest to date — proposed for land near the Metro-North train station.

Nearly all the speakers at the Planning Board hearing took issue with the density of the Edgewater project being proposed by Scenic Beacon Developments in a part of the city that so far has been relatively untouched by the residential building boom.

“The idea of this huge building is a huge nightmare,” Beacon resident Samantha Britton told the board. A moment later, she asked spectators to stand if they were opposed to the project. About two-thirds of the audience rose.

“There is a huge crisis in this city,” she said. “Families that helped build this city are being kicked out because they cannot afford to live here.”

An early rendering of the 22 Edgewater Place project presented to the Beacon Planning Board

Scenic Beacon has proposed 307 units on a 12-acre wooded site just northeast of the train station. Its plan calls for the creation of a walking path overlooking the Hudson River as well as a park in the middle of the seven-building development. Two existing buildings on the site would be demolished.

The company, managed by Rodney Weber, is also asking the Zoning Board of Appeals for several variances — for the number of units allowed per building, the space between buildings and stories allowed per building. The exceptions would reduce the construction footprint, explained architect Aryeh Siegel, who is working with Weber.

Members of the Planning Board have been critical of the proposal, particularly its size and possible effect on traffic. Citing public interest in the project, the board held a public hearing earlier in the process than is typical. Additional hearings are expected.

Beacon resident Donna Francis said the city should consider a moratorium on building in Beacon. “This is a small town; it’s five square miles — how much more can we cram into it?” she asked.

Justin Riccobono, who lives near the Edgewater site, said the project would add much-needed housing. “People can’t even find places to live” in Beacon, he said. “There is a supply-and-demand issue. I’m hoping that these projects throughout the entire city will help cool the market. When there’s more out there, the price comes down.”

But Meredith Heuer, a member of the Beacon school board who said she was  speaking as an individual, cautioned that continued development could create a “huge hardship” on the school system. “At a certain point we won’t be able to fit the classes in the buildings anymore,” she said.

The final speaker, Mark Bobbitt, who also lives near the site, expressed concern about traffic, construction runoff and wildlife. “Where are these deer going to go?” he asked. “They’ve lived on this property for the 20 years I’ve been here.”

The public hearing will continue at the next Planning Board meeting at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, June 13. In the meantime, the board has asked Scenic Beacon for information on the environmental and infrastructure impacts of the project.

“At this time we are very early in the local review process,” Weber, the Scenic Beacon manager, wrote in an email on May 11. “We are listening to comments from the public and taking a hard look at any potential environmental impacts. We will continue to work with the community and the board.”

One Response to "Edgewater Project Raises Concerns"

  1. Lisa Gallina Alvarez   May 13, 2017 at 9:24 pm

    It is important to look at the immense power one developer can have in our community. I think it would be helpful to outline all the projects Mr. Weber is involved with and dig deep into how much they will collectively impact the city. They don’t seem to be affordable? They do appear to focus on high density which can be a good thing, done right. Not when steep slopes, traffic congestion and displacement of the families who live their, now takes place.

    It could be a more modest version of this plan. It should be smaller in scope and scale to maintain some semblance of sanity.

    The perceived shortage of housing will be tested as the current. Five hundred units in that are approved in various phases of development are rented or sold… or sit vacant potentially. Are these developers receiving PILOT or other tax reductions? If we build it they may not keep coming and coming… We can build ourselves into oblivion!

    We must be thoughtful, consider the total impacts and look at what the market can truly handle fiscally, socially and environmentally.

    Reply

What Do You Think?

To keep the discourse at its highest level, we have a few rules: (1) Posts must have the full name of poster (no first name only, no pseudonyms) and a valid email address. (2) All comments are reviewed by a moderator before they are posted. (3) A civil tone is important. Attack the argument, not the person. (4) Posts will be edited for spelling and grammar. All comments may also appear in print.

Your email address will not be published.