Stonecrop Wants to Add More Parking, Better Handicap Access

Planning board expected to approve plan

By Liz Schevtchuk Armstrong

Just as the green leaves and pastel flowers appeared in late April, plans by Stonecrop Gardens for upgrades unfolded, following actions by two Philipstown boards.

The nonprofit, located on 67 acres off Route 301, hopes to construct a building and improve parking and handicapped accessibility.

On April 24, the Philipstown Zoning Board of Appeals approved Stonecrop’s request for a variance so that a tower on the building can rise 7 feet above the limit set for ridgeline structures. The Planning Board has scheduled a public hearing for Thursday, May 18, on Stonecrop’s overall plan.

At the April 24 Zoning Board meeting, architect Tim Rasic and Glenn Watson of Badey & Watson Surveying presented plans for the Stonecrop Gardens upgrade. (Photo by L.S. Armstrong)

According to materials filed with the Planning Board, Stonecrop wants to replace a two-story, 2,500-square-foot structure destroyed by fire in 2016 with a 3,800-square-foot facility to accommodate more visitors. Called a bothy (Scots-English for “cottage”), it would serve as a welcome center to the gardens, with a gift shop and refreshment area as well as space for workshops and small gatherings.

Its design reflects the historic French-manor style of buildings on the Stonecrop property, said the project architect, Timothy Rasic of New York City-based Janko Rasic Architects. Glennon Watson, of Badey & Watson Surveying and Engineering of Cold Spring, presented the tower plan to the board.

The plans for Stonecrop (click to enlarge)

Stonecrop’s upgrade also includes more parking. Its current lot accommodates 28 cars and two buses, or 35 cars. The new plan provides parking for 67 cars and two buses, or 74 cars. It also designates three handicapped spaces in the lot and one space inside the garden. (Currently handicapped visitors must call ahead to make parking arrangements.)

Watson told the Zoning Board that the parking configuration would respect the surroundings as much as possible. “We’ve tucked the parking between trees and taken advantage of little open areas, where we don’t have to cut as many trees,” he said.

In March, Planning Board members expressed concern that the three handicapped spots would be too far from the bothy. A revised plan presented on April 20 halves the distance. “It’s an invasion into the gardens, but we think it’s a reasonable compromise,” Watson said.

Anthony Merante, who chairs the board, recalled a trip to Stonecrop three years ago when his household included two individuals in wheelchairs. Finding accessibility limited, the group abandoned their visit, he said. “To me, it’s very important” to make Stonecrop open to all, he said.

One Response to "Stonecrop Wants to Add More Parking, Better Handicap Access"

  1. Suzanne Murray   May 17, 2017 at 9:12 am

    Handicapped?! Really, Highlands Current? Use “visitors with disabilities” or “people who use wheelchairs,” not “handicapped people/visitors.” Use “accessible parking,” not “handicapped parking.” The terms you use in the headline and throughout the article have been known to be disrespectful, insensitive, dehumanizing and offensive for decades. As writers and editors, you know how important inclusive language is. Do better.

    Reply

What Do You Think?

To keep the discourse at its highest level, we have a few rules: (1) Posts must have the full name of poster (no first name only, no pseudonyms) and a valid email address. (2) All comments are reviewed by a moderator before they are posted. (3) A civil tone is important. Attack the argument, not the person. (4) Posts will be edited for spelling and grammar. All comments may also appear in print.

Your email address will not be published.