Putnam Votes to Sue Drug Companies

Claims negligent marketing of opioid pain pills

By Chip Rowe

Putnam County is joining more than 100 other counties and states in suing drug companies that it claims contributed to the opioid addiction crisis through “fraudulent and negligent” marketing and careless distribution of pain pills.

During the county’s Nov. 15 Rules Committee meeting, Neal Sullivan (R-Mahopac) cited a 60 Minutes–Washington Post investigation in October that detailed how the drug industry lobbied a handful of members of Congress to weaken regulations designed to prevent large shipments of opioids to corrupt doctors and pharmacists.

The report also noted the pharmaceutical industry has spent $102 million lobbying Congress between 2014 and 2016.

“It is a clear indication [the pharmaceutical companies] are in it for the money,” Sullivan said. “They’re killing 91 people a day who overdose. We’re going to join this lawsuit to put some pressure on these companies.”

Barbara Scuccimarra (R-Philipstown) said she was pleased the county is moving ahead. “It’s not just to get monetary payback for what we’ve expended,” she said. “It’s to send a message to these companies that it’s time to change the way you do business.”

There is precedent for holding large corporations responsible for downplaying the health effects of their products. In 1998, 46 states settled with the tobacco industry for $200 billion after arguing manufacturers had covered up the risks of smoking.

“As president of the New York Association of Counties, I think it is imperative that we learn from the tobacco lawsuits of the 1990s and collectively go after the source of the prescription opioid epidemic,” said County Executive Mary Ellen Odell in a statement.

Purdue Pharma, which makes the painkiller OxyContin, has been sued by multiple counties. (Shutterstock)

Putnam County Attorney Jennifer Bumgarner noted the lawsuit was not part of a class action but rather one of many individual suits filed by counties and states. In June, Dutchess County sued 11 pharmaceutical companies, and Orange, Rockland, Westchester and at least eight other New York counties also have sued as part of a coordinated effort called the New York Opioid Cost Recovery litigation.

In addition manufacturers and distributors, looking for evidence they knew of the risks of addiction to pain pills. Most recently, officials in four towns in West Virginia sued a nonprofit that sets standards for hospitals, arguing it had spread “misinformation” beginning in 2001 in its directives on using opioids for pain management.

The challenge for plaintiffs is that opioids are not tobacco. People who abuse prescription opioids, which are approved by the FDA for pain relief, are not using them as directed and taking more than prescribed (unlike cigarettes, which people do use as designed). In addition, most marketing is aimed at doctors, not the user. Like gunmakers, the drug companies and distributors likely will argue that people, not its products, are responsible.

Bumgarner said the lawsuit will not cost the county anything, because the firm that many neighboring counties have hired, and which advised Putnam officials — Napoli Shkolnik, based in New York City — is working on a contingency basis, meaning it will be paid from any settlement.

“They have absolutely agreed to provide us the resources, and that they will do the legwork and look through the documents themselves,” said Bumgarner.

The Legislature met Nov. 21 to approve the lawsuit, which seeks damages for “deceptive acts and practices, false advertising, public nuisance, fraud and unjust enrichment” from the “largest manufacturers and marketers of opioid pain medications,” such as Purdue Pharmaceuticals, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Johnson & Johnson and Endo Pharmaceuticals; as well as the largest distributors, which are McKesson Corp., Cardinal Health and AmerisourceBergen.

According to the resolution, the goal of the litigation is to compensate the county for costs incurred from prescription opioid abuse, including loss of productivity in the workplace, health care costs such as treatment, and criminal justice costs.

But Legislature Chairwoman Ginny Nacerino (R-Patterson) said the chief objective of the litigation isn’t financial. “We don’t anticipate receiving a lot of money,” she said. “But it is important to send a message. It is important to stop what has been going on for so many years.”

Paul Jonke (R-Brewster) called the litigation a good first step, saying the lawsuit and others like it send a message to drug companies “that we’re going to hold them responsible for the crisis they’ve created in our little community. Hopefully they’ll see some financial obligation down the road, or we’ll be able to recoup some funds for education, and get some folks help.”

Holly Crocco contributed reporting.

2 Responses to "Putnam Votes to Sue Drug Companies"

  1. Kelly House   December 1, 2017 at 6:05 pm

    While it is certainly good that the pharmaceutical industry is being called to task on this regrettable issue (and definitely more than a day late), I feel doctors should be called out in not sharing responsibility for overprescribing. They know their clientele and they know what road they will likely travel.

    What about the line in the Hippocratic oath, “I will prevent disease whenever I can, for prevention is preferable to cure”? Doctors should step up to the plate and adopt a broader view of their treatments and consequences.

    Reply
  2. Tim Donovan   December 7, 2017 at 10:15 am

    The chemistry of pain relief is cheap, making the opioid category dangerously lucrative for both licensed and illegal distributors. Smart, tough leadership is the only course of action left for mutual protection, like the step taken in the article.

    Updated guidelines for sentencing convicted traffickers in the opioid category are another possible step. Due to the ease and rate of opioid addiction, leadership should require sentences that irrevocably stop traffickers in this category.

    With mercy and resources for the addicted and their families, traffickers deserve next to none. Whether they wear jeans or a suit and do business under an American or foreign flag, it’d be helpful to shift the pain of families and the addicted onto the backs of traffickers, large and small.

    Reply

What Do You Think?

To keep the discourse at its highest level, we have a few rules: (1) Posts must have the full name of poster (no first name only, no pseudonyms) and a valid email address. (2) All comments are reviewed by a moderator before they are posted. Please allow up to 24 hours. (3) A civil tone is important. Attack the argument, not the person. (4) Posts will be edited for spelling and grammar. All comments may also appear in print.

Your email address will not be published.