Is Indian Point Pipeline Safe?

Risk assessment long overdue

By Liz Schevtchuk Armstrong

In February 2016, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo commissioned a study of the risks of running a gas pipeline through the Indian Point nuclear plant site. Seven months later, the state told the consulting firm preparing the $275,000 assessment to complete it by Dec. 31, 2016.

More than a year after that deadline, the study hasn’t been released and its status remains unclear.

After repeated efforts to pry loose the document through Freedom of Information Law requests, activists are urging Cuomo and local officials to do something. Stop the Algonquin Pipeline Expansion (SAPE), formed as the pipeline plans took shape, is among the groups that will take part in an “interfaith climate vigil” for Feb. 25 outside Cuomo’s Mount Kisco home.

Demonstrators protest the pipeline near Indian Point in August 2016. (Photo by Erik McGregor)

Known as the Algonquin Incremental Market (AIM) project, the 42-inch pipeline began operation in January 2017 despite opposition from environmentalists and scientists who argued that a high-pressure pipe cannot be safely snaked through 2,300 feet of a nuclear power complex, much less one, like Indian Point, in an earthquake fault.

Although Indian Point is scheduled to close by spring 2021, critics contend that dangers of a pipeline accident will remain because spent radioactive fuel will be stored at the facility indefinitely.

Constructed by Spectra Energy, AIM is a link in a system to carry natural gas from the Marcellus Shale formation in Pennsylvania into New York, beneath the Hudson River, and across Putnam County into Connecticut, Massachusetts and Rhode Island. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approved the pipeline, although critics contend that its decision was based on erroneous data.

On Feb. 1, Philipstown resident Paula Clair asked the Town Board to call for the study to be released, saying that “we who live close to the nuclear plant have a right to know” of the hazards. Clair, who sits on the town’s Zoning Board of Appeals, said that the proximity of the gas pipeline to spent nuclear fuel means that “if there was an explosion or a fire, it would be a catastrophe.”

A draft resolution she proposed noted that a radioactive release caused by an explosion could “render Philipstown uninhabitable for generations.”

Workers for Spectra Energy prepare to drag the 42-inch gas pipeline under the Hudson River near Indian Point in August 2016. (Photo by Erik McGregor)

Philipstown Supervisor Richard Shea agreed that the study, paid for with taxpayer funds, should be released, and promised that the board would consider passing a measure soon. “I don’t think it’s going to be a problem” approving it, he said.

Susan Van Dolsen, co-founder of SAPE, said her organization has been attempting to get a copy of the study through FOIL and other means since mid-2016, without success. Instead of the study, the state sent stacks of emails and other items, often of dubious relevance, she said, with large portions blacked out.

Sandy Galef, who represents Philipstown and Beacon in the state Assembly and serves on the task force looking at the impact of Indian Point’s closure, also wants the assessment released.

In a Jan. 19 letter to Cuomo, she reminded the governor that she had previously asked to see the document, which, she said, becomes especially important as the task force looks at possible re-uses of Indian Point after its nuclear operations cease. “I don’t think we can move forward without all possible information,” she wrote.

As of Thursday (Feb. 22), the governor’s office had not responded to questions posed a week earlier by The Current about the study. The state Office of General Services, which oversaw the contract for the study, on Feb. 14 referred inquiries to the state Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Services, which also did not respond.

2 Responses to "Is Indian Point Pipeline Safe?"

  1. Judy Allen   February 25, 2018 at 8:18 pm

    Speaking as one who has been campaigning to close Indian Point since moving to Putnam Valley in 1980, and who is currently awaiting a jury trial in the Town of Cortlandt for illegal trespass onto the construction site of the Algonquin Pipeline Expansion, I have to say that if the federal agencies tasked with protecting the health and safety of 20 million residents in the 50-mile radius around Indian Point refuse to do their job, then we as citizens must draw attention to their failure to do so.

    We strongly protest the cavalier attitude of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), who have both failed to conduct the necessary studies to determine the safety of a 42-inch diameter fracked gas pipeline installed 105 feet from the radioactive waste pools and containers at Indian Point, which sits a mile from the junction of two earthquake faults. What could possibly go wrong?

  2. Bob Christman   February 26, 2018 at 1:38 pm

    Funny how all the debate is about installing a new pipeline almost directly next to the existing pipeline that has been there for longer than I can remember. I also question the 105 feet comment as it is probably much further than that. On the flip side, I see no reason that the report can not be obtained or published regardless who is asking for it.